银行行政处罚监管、外部审计监督与信贷风险防控:互补还是替代?
    点此下载全文
引用本文:池国华1,周正义2.银行行政处罚监管、外部审计监督与信贷风险防控:互补还是替代?[J].财经理论与实践,2025,(2):71-80
摘要点击次数: 52
全文下载次数: 34
作者单位
池国华1,周正义2 (1.南京审计大学 内部审计学院江苏 南京 211815 2.江西财经大学 会计学院江西 南昌 330013) 
中文摘要:基于2007—2021年中国沪深A股上市银行数据,选择银行行政处罚监管视角,探究银行监管与外部审计监督在信贷风险防控中的相互关系。研究表明:在信贷风险防控中,银行行政处罚监管与外部审计监督存在互补关系,且该互补关系并非源自外部审计质量的中介效应,而是双方能够实现优势互补并形成监督合力。协调互补机制在于外部审计师能够根据处罚公告信息确定信贷业务审计重点,而银行监管部门也可利用外部审计工作增强其对信贷业务的监管;双方在信贷风险防控中的互补作用,对非国有产权、审计师独立性强、内部控制质量高的银行更加显著。
中文关键词:银行行政处罚监管  外部审计监督  信贷风险  互补关系  替代关系
 
Bank Administrative Penalty Supervision,External Audit Supervision and Credit Risk Prevention Control:Complementary or Substitution Relationship?
Abstract:Based on the data of A-share listed banks in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2007 to 2021, this study selects the perspective of bank administrative penalty supervision to explore the mutual relationship between bank supervision and external audit supervision in credit risk prevention and control. It is found that in credit risk prevention and control, there is a complementary relationship between bank administrative penalty supervision and external audit supervision, and the complementary relationship is not derived from the mediating effect of external audit quality, but the two sides can achieve complementary advantages and form supervision synergy. The coordination and complementary mechanism is that the external auditor can determine the audit focus of credit business according to the penalty announcement information, and the bank supervision department can also use the external audit work to enhance the supervision of credit business; the complementary role of the two sides in credit risk prevention and control is more significant for banks with non-state-owned property rights, strong auditor independence and high quality of internal control.
keywords:bank administrative penalty supervision  external audit supervision  credit risk  complementary relationship  substitution relationship
查看全文   查看/发表评论   下载pdf阅读器