中澳反垄断滥用市场支配地位规制立法比较

李小明; 吴倩

中澳反垄断滥用市场支配地位规制立法比较

引用本文：李小明,吴倩.中澳反垄断滥用市场支配地位规制立法比较[J].财经理论与实践,2013,(3):124-128

摘要点击次数: 1567

全文下载次数: 35

作者	单位
李小明,吴倩	（湖南大学法学院，湖南长沙410082）

中文摘要:滥用市场支配地位是反垄断法三大支柱之一，在反垄断法中具有举足轻重的地位。中澳规制滥用市场支配地位制度立法不尽相同。澳大利亚与中国不同未设立市场支配地位推定制度。澳大利亚反垄断立法认定滥用市场支配地位采取过错责任原则，而中国适应严格责任原则。澳大利亚反垄断法对滥用市场支配地位的处罚幅度大于中国立法。中国反垄断法应坚持市场支配地位推定制度及严格责任原则、对滥用市场支配地位加大处罚力度并规定刑事责任。

中文关键词:滥用市场支配地位认定标准表现形式法律责任

Comparative Study of Abuse of Dominant Position between Australia and China

Abstract:As one of three pillars of anti-monopoly law, abuse of dominant position takes an absolute important position in the act. The differentiated legislature exists between in Australia and in China. The presumption system is not regulated in Australian act, which is different with Chinese ones. Fault liability is acted in Australian law, but strict ones in Chinese act. Actually, the punishment in Australian is much stricter than that in China. Chinese regulation of abuse of dominant position should keep fault and strict liability, and increase the efforts of punishment. Criminal liability is suggested to be included.

keywords:Abuse of dominant position Defined standard Forms of performance Legal liability

查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载pdf阅读器